Subject: Re: [LPNY DISCUSS] Check this out on FrontPageMag.com!
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:21:17 -0400
To:        <lpny_discuss@yahoogroups.com>
From:     Bob Armstrong <bob@cosy.com>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:04:38 -0000, Ronald J. Wieck wrote:
>=A0--- In lpny_discuss@yahoogroups.com, Bob Armstrong=
 <bob@c...>=A0wrote:
>=A0>=A0>=A0http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3D948=
6
>=A0>
>=A0>=A0Silly .
>
>=A0Bob, you condemn as silly a very plausible explanation by=
 someone who
>=A0knows vastly more about the subject than you do. 

 Well , apparently he didn't watch and listen to the discussions=
 in
 the UN or the many independent statements by Iraqis and others
 who give a rather complete history of the destruction of the=
 weapons
 and the fact that there was no effective attempt to rebuild them=
 .
 All they failed to do is maintain the paperwork at US=
 bureaucratic
 standards .

> Everyone, apart from
>=A0yourself, acknowledges that Saddam had, in the past, coveted,
>=A0developed, and employed WMD. 

 What is that about !?  everyone other than Helen Keller knows
 Saddam had ... .  Hell , we helped him get them when we thought
 it would help us "geopolitically" .

> Everyone, including geopolitical
>=A0opponents of the U.S. such as France and Russia, acknowledges=
 that
>=A0his goals hadn't changed and he was merely trying to ride out=
 the
>=A0sanctions regime. Where, then, are the weapons? The notion=
 that
>=A0Russian specialists devised for the Iraqis a method of=
 concealing the
>=A0evidence simply cannot be dismissed so cavalierly.

 Yes it can .  Your guy's been thinking too much .

> You're a bright=A0guy and an engaging lunch companion.

 Well , thank you .

> On this matter, I think, your
>=A0unwillingness to entertain alternate possibilities amounts to
>=A0dogmatism.

 We'll see where the fleas land .

--=A0
=A0Bob Armstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864
Liberty : http://cosy.com/Liberty.htm