Subject: Re: [LPNY DISCUSS] Re: Nolan vs. Russo Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:52:45 -0400 To: From: Bob Armstrong On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:47:17 -0000, rhymetofree6 wrote: >=A0--- In lpny_discuss@yahoogroups.com, Bob Armstrong= =A0wrote: >=A0> >=A0>=A0It is well understood that 7 WTC fell because of the= continued >=A0>=A0burning of massive amounts of fuel oil stored in its= basement >=A0>=A0for back up power for the phone hub there . > >=A0I saw the slow motion of WTC 7's collapse on the Internet. =A0It= and >=A0the other towers fell directly and neatly downwards without= help? =A0I >=A0don't theenk so. Well , as I've said before , your thinking is wrong . What IS= difficult is to make them do anything else . It is a fundamental issue of conservation of angular momentum .= There has to be a force to cause them to do anything other than fall= in a radially symmetric manner . You will notice that there is a= tremendous amount of material ejected outward in clouds of pulverized= concrete etc . In lieu of cable and the Discovery and History channels , some= browsing should get you to detailed engineering descriptions of the= problem in general and the WTC collapse specifically . >=A0Please don't be offended, but I'm not going to spend a lot of= time on >=A0this. =A0You are relying on what was discussed -- and not --= with >=A0friends and in the media. =A0I've already given you the search >=A0string "9-11 skeptics" and that is the best I can do. =A0Too many= loose >=A0ends. I followed some . Have you followed any of the paths to solid= engineering sites ? >=A0But all I concluded is that we can't have a secret government. On this we agree . And the Bush regime is the most dangerously secretive I have seen - particularly in its unlimited denial of= habeas corpus to prisoners . >=A0Nothing more is necessary and the LP is already addressing= that >=A0situation. =A0I have no complaints. > >=A0>=A0A cursory ( very ) look at the notion of abnormal short= selling >=A0>=A0of about 5M shares of UAL and AMR don't seem statistically >=A0>=A0out of the ordinary , but I'm sure it's been and is being= analysed >=A0>=A0pretty closely . > >=A0Aha! =A0Something fishy, but someone we pay to look at this, or= the >=A0Press, are on top of it? =A0"Fool me once ..." > >=A0But you read about it and mentioned it. =A0So it's getting= around. =A0And >=A0we will see. It's been around a long time . I wish I had a job with a= financial institution where the necessary data was readily available . >=A0>=A0But any of this BS diverts attention from the basic fact= that >=A0>=A0the Government both totally disarmed the planes , and failed= to >=A0>=A0scramble fighter escorts automatically when they were= hijacked >=A0>=A0and off course . > >=A0I don't know what you mean by "disarmed the planes" but yes,= where >=A0were our air defenses? If I were running an airline , I would be sure all flight crews= were armed but screen passengers for weapons , securing , but not confiscating them for the duration of the flight . >=A0Ever see that photo of J. Edgar Hoover in drag? =A0I saw it on= the >=A0History Channel. =A0What would people have said back when if you= had >=A0said the man was a transvestite? Never caught that one . Like Modern Marvels tho . --=A0 =A0Bob Armstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864 Computing Environment : =A0http://CoSy.com/CoSy/ A WTC vision : http://CoSy.com/CoSy/ConicAllConnect/ Libertarian Presidential Candidates =A0:= http://CoSy.com/Liberty.htm Restore our Right to Relax : =A0http://ny.lp.org/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?Against_the_Smoking_Ban =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A02004/04/29 10:32:38 AM