Subject: Re: [drugwar] (OT) screwing each other Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 19:07:00 -0400 To: From: Bob Armstrong On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:12:34 EDT, SherriTheWriter@aol.com wrote: > Screwing other people's lives is an American tradition and the= foundation of unrestrained capitalism. I believe human inclinations and behaviors are universal and= not unique to America or else where . Nor are they unique to either= the free market class or the political class . Whether you see the dominant drive screwing others or= cooperating with them , is I feel a matter of emphasis . I keep emphasising , the only difference is freedom to choose= your partners or subjection to your local geographic monopoly of force . ( is being screwed by the State , rape ? ) It is clear from history that the monopoly , socialist ,= structure fails to produce the wealth , for poor as well rich , that free= market choice produces . With all the supposed horrors of industrialization , you have to ask why people chose to move to the cities and take such awful jobs rather than stay home on= the farm . > we continue through today, where the average person -- and the= average person is not middle-class -- works desperately hard to= just barely achieve a minimal standard of living. Look at the= schools and health care systems lower income people must contend= with... When you consider that 15.5% of your paycheck is taken before= you see it so you will get ( currently ) max $1500 per month when you= retire , and the total taken for one thing or another , including "freeing"= Iraq , and criminalizing US , is closer to half , it does leave you with a= lot less to spend on your current needs for the best choices you may find . Of course schools and health care are the 2 most socialized= segments of our economy , so your beneficent State seems to be failing . > Perhaps my thinking is a bit clouded at this moment by the pure= agony of the $1500 root canal my uninsured self needs, Ouch . Your dentist must be a selfish bastard for screwing you= like that . Note that insurance of highly likely events isn't really= insurance , and it doesn't make anything cheaper ; it just spreads the payments . > Nanny Socialism?? Does that refer to a system that would ensure that the basic= necessities of life - education and healthcare - are available= to all? This is classic economic socialism which made such basket cases= out of the USSR and Eastern Europe and every other place that tried= it . > Does that refer to a system in which, instead of spending= billions on bombs and war, These are core enterprises of the State monopoly . > we strive to bring an end to homelessness, hunger and poverty? Best way to do that is to go into business producing homes or= food . Creating a bureaucracy to take from those who do produce things= and redistribute their resources is at best just rearranging= deck chairs . > What, please, if you have a moment, does Nanny Socialism mean= to you? I've coined "Nanny Socialism" to differentiate the attacks on= our personal "lifestyle" freedoms from the classic economic= socialism while emphasizing their common theme of use of force by the= political class . Nanny Socialism generally corresponds to the left , "personal"= side of the Nolan chart ( http://www.self-gov.org/ ) measuring Authoritarian / Libertarian political beliefs . --=A0 =A0Bob Armstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864 Return our Right to Relax : =A0http://ny.lp.org/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?Against_the_Smoking_Ban Liberty : http://CoSy.com/Liberty.htm =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A02003/10/04 5:49:39 PM