Subject: Re: [lpny_manhattan] Re: Advocating fraud, prostitution, etc. Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:05:31 -0500 To: From: Bob Armstrong On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:48:18 -0000, Andrea Snell wrote: >=A0--- In lpny_manhattan@yahoogroups.com, Gary Snyder= =A0wrote: >=A0>=A0Joseph wrote: >=A0>=A0> >=A0>=A0>=A0This is another tough call, by the way. =A0Can one morally= justify >=A0the >=A0>=A0>=A0use of perjury to save someone from a prison term you= don't >=A0think he >=A0>=A0>=A0deserves? >=A0> >=A0>=A0I can't think of an EASIER moral question. >=A0> >=A0>=A0Damn right I could morally justify it. =A0A better question is= can >=A0>=A0one morally justify NOT using perjury to sit on a jury in= order >=A0>=A0to prevent a wrong (say, a drug, tax or gun conviction) from >=A0>=A0happening. >=A0> >=A0>=A0Gary > >=A0Alright, you just justified selective use of fraud ( for= yourself at >=A0least) when it is for a greater good - or so as to prevent what= you >=A0see as a greater evil. .... While I see your added examples to be non sequitur , I will= restate my rejection of dishonesty in the name a greater good , despite= the horrendous corruption of the right to trial by peers that voir= dire has inevitably become . I like the recommendation I heard to simply say that I don't see= how my conscience and the law could be in conflict , putting the= ball back in their court . And I say this having been rejected for a petty Lower East Side= coke buy and bust jury in secret voir dire . At the time I was so= naive I volunteered my disgust with the laws without prompting . But bottom line , I would not sacrifice my personal integrity= for a incidental obscure victory . Rather , I will pursue the battle= here and wherever I can on the basis of honest logic . --=A0 =A0Bob Armstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864 Liberty : http://CoSy.com/Liberty.htm Restore our Right to Relax : =A0http://ny.lp.org/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?Against_the_Smoking_Ban =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A02004/02/21 3:43:50 PM